<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Family Practice - current issue</title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Family Practice - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2229</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>August 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Family Practice</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0263-2136</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/294?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/304?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/312?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accuracy and completeness of electronic patient records in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majeed, A., Car, J., Sheikh, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accuracy and completeness of electronic patient records in primary care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/215?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/215?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> The medical records of patients with cancer need to accurately record diagnoses for professionals to provide quality care.</p>
<p><b>Aims.</b> (i) To develop a methodology which identifies medical records of patients with a cancer diagnosis. (ii) To describe the effectiveness of search strategies to identify all patients in primary care with a cancer diagnosis compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> The design of the study was a retrospective analysis of primary care medical records. Five general practices were recruited in the UK. The completeness and correctness of searches were measured and compared both within the practices and compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> One in five of all primary care patients with cancer was not identified when a search for all patients with cancer was conducted using electronic codes for malignancy. One in five patient records with an electronic code for a malignancy that was confirmed by registration with the Cancer Registry actually lacked the necessary documentation to verify the cancer type, date of diagnosis or any other aspect of the malignant condition. Overall, electronic codes for cancer in these medical records have a poor level of completeness (29.4%) and correctness (65.6%) when compared with the Cancer Registry.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> The electronic codes in five general practices were not able to identify all patients on the practice lists with a cancer diagnosis. Practices will only be able to comply with guidelines and meet quality targets if they can identify all of their current patients with a cancer diagnosis and will require information from a Cancer Registry in order to do this.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pascoe, S. W, Neal, R. D, Heywood, P. L, Allgar, V. L, Miles, J. N., Stefoski-Mikeljevic, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Primary Care Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/221?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Excision of malignant melanomas in North Wales: effect of location and surgeon on time to diagnosis and quality of excision]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/221?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> The epidemiology of melanoma is changing and its current management is variable, with some lesions being removed in general practice. We aimed to determine the quality of excision and time to diagnosis relating to the excising surgeon and the place of excision.</p>
<p><b>Method.</b> Analysis of data from the North Wales Melanoma Database.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> In total, 578 cases were diagnosed 1993&ndash;2001. There was a gender difference with anatomical location, with 107 (65%) males with lesions on their trunk compared to 57 (35%) females. Median Breslow thickness was 1.10 mm (range 0.05&ndash;16.0 mm). Ninety-five (16%) lesions were removed in general practice, of which 49 (52%) were referred on to hospital. In total, 266 (61%) lesions were excised with &lsquo;adequate&rsquo; margins and 170 (39%) excised with margins narrower than the guidelines. General practice excisions were from a younger group than hospital excisions. There were no differences in quality of excision between general practice and hospital excisions. Time to diagnosis was shorter overall for general practice excisions than hospital excisions (median 12 versus 41 days, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion.</b> These findings are of policy importance in that there is no evidence from this study that general practice excisions are managed poorly or have a worse prognosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal, R. D, Cannings-John, R., Hood, K., Sowden, J., Lawrence, H., Jones, C., Jones, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Excision of malignant melanomas in North Wales: effect of location and surgeon on time to diagnosis and quality of excision]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Primary Care Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ankle-brachial index measured by palpation for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> The ankle&ndash;brachial index (ABI), i.e. the ratio of the ankle to brachial systolic blood pressure, is the golden standard for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is a highly specific method for the assessment of vascular risk in otherwise asymptomatic patients.</p>
<p><b>Objective.</b> To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ABI measured by palpation in patients at increased cardiovascular risk in a primary care setting.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Twenty-four GPs enrolled 10 consecutive patients each, at intermediate cardiovascular risk, based on age &gt;55 and &lt;65 years and one or two associated major cardiovascular risk factors or age &gt;65 and &lt;80 years without associated cardiovascular risk factor. Clinical data recording and measurements of the ABI were performed. The design of the study was a prospective, blind comparison between the ABI measured by palpation by the GP and simultaneously by Doppler ultrasound by an angiologist (reference test).</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Out of 240 enrolled patients, 205 completed the study (35 lost to follow-up); in 9, ABI by palpation was not measurable. Out of the remaining 196 assessable patients, 8 (4.08%) had PAD. Sensitivity of the palpation method was 88% (95% confidence intervals: 65&ndash;100), specificity 82% (77&ndash;88), positive predictive value 18% (6&ndash;29), negative predictive value 99% (98&ndash;100), positive likelihood ratio = 4.98 (3.32&ndash;7.48) and negative likelihood ratio = 0.15 (0.02&ndash;0.95).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> The measurement of ABI by palpation in the setting of primary care, in patients at intermediate cardiovascular risk, is a sufficiently sensitive method to consider its use as a screening test for the exclusion of PAD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Migliacci, R., Nasorri, R., Ricciarini, P., Gresele, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ankle-brachial index measured by palpation for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Primary Care Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is pacifier use a risk factor for acute otitis media? A dynamic cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> Recently, the use of a pacifier has been identified as a risk factor for acute otitis media (AOM). The studies performed so far, however, suffer from methodological limitations.</p>
<p><b>Objective.</b> To study whether pacifier use increases the risk of AOM.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Four hundred and ninety-five children between the ages of 0 and 4 years followed from 2000 to 2005 in a dynamic population study in the Leidsche Rijn residential area in Utrecht, The Netherlands. At baseline, the parents of these children filled out a questionnaire regarding pacifier use and potential confounders. AOM was diagnosed by GPs according to the International Classification of Primary Care coding system. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Of the 216 children that used a pacifier at baseline, 76 (35%) developed at least one episode of AOM, and of the 260 children that did not use a pacifier, 82 (32%) developed at least one AOM episode; for recurrent AOM, these figures were 33 (16%) versus 27 (11%), respectively. The adjusted ORs for pacifier use and AOM and recurrent AOM were 1.3 (95% CI 0.9&ndash;1.9) and 1.9 (95% CI 1.1&ndash;3.2), respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion.</b> Pacifier use appears to be a risk factor for recurrent AOM. Parents should be informed about the possible negative effects of using a pacifier once their child has been diagnosed with AOM to avoid recurrent episodes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rovers, M. M, Numans, M. E, Langenbach, E., Grobbee, D. E, Verheij, T. J., Schilder, A. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is pacifier use a risk factor for acute otitis media? A dynamic cohort study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Primary Care Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of lumbar spinal stenosis]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> To our knowledge, no objective criterion has been identified for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and no study has evaluated the predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of LSS.</p>
<p><b>Objective.</b> To develop and validate a prediction rule for the identification of LSS based on self-reported patient information alone.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Prospective derivation study using a coefficient-based multivariable logistic regression scoring method with internal validation with primary care clinics and orthopaedic departments of medical centres, as well as university and other hospitals. Participants were consecutive patients with primary symptoms of pain or numbness in the lower extremities. Physician-diagnosed LSS was the main outcome measure.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Of 468 patients included in the analysis, 47.3% were diagnosed with LSS and divided into derivation and validation sets. The following items were retained at the conclusion of the derivation process: age (&lt;60, 60&ndash;70 and &gt;70), duration of symptoms over 6 months, symptom improvement when bending forward, symptom improvement when bending backward, symptom exacerbation while standing up, intermittent claudication and urinary incontinence. To derive a risk score for each patient, integer-based scores were assigned and summed. In the validation data sets, prevalence of LSS in patients from the first to fourth risk score quartile were 13.3%, 47.6%, 55.2% and 65.5%, respectively. Further, the likelihood ratio in the low-risk category was 0.154.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> We developed a prediction rule for the identification of LSS based on self-reported patient information alone. Further, the likelihood ratio in the low-risk category was sufficiently low. This rule may be used for screening of LSS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sugioka, T., Hayashino, Y., Konno, S., Kikuchi, S., Fukuhara, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of lumbar spinal stenosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>244</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Primary Care Epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burnout in European family doctors: the EGPRN study]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Introduction.</b> The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of burnout, and of associated factors, amongst family doctors (FDs) in European countries.</p>
<p><b>Methodology.</b> A cross-sectional survey of FDs was conducted using a custom-designed and validated questionnaire which incorporated the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) as well as questions about demographic factors, working experience, health, lifestyle and job satisfaction. MBI-HSS scores were analysed in the three dimensions of emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP) and personal accomplishment (PA).</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Almost 3500 questionnaires were distributed in 12 European countries, and 1393 were returned to give a response rate of 41%. In terms of burnout, 43% of respondents scored high for EE burnout, 35% for DP and 32% for PA, with 12% scoring high burnout in all three dimensions. Just over one-third of doctors did not score high for burnout in any dimension. High burnout was found to be strongly associated with several of the variables under study, especially those relative to respondents&rsquo; country of residence and European region, job satisfaction, intention to change job, sick leave utilization, the (ab)use of alcohol, tobacco and psychotropic medication, younger age and male sex.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> Burnout seems to be a common problem in FDs across Europe and is associated with personal and workload indicators, and especially job satisfaction, intention to change job and the (ab)use of alcohol, tobacco and medication. The study questionnaire appears to be a valid tool to measure burnout in FDs. Recommendations for employment conditions of FDs and future research are made, and suggestions for improving the instrument are listed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soler, J. K., Yaman, H., Esteva, M., Dobbs, F., Asenova, R. S., Katic, M., Ozvacic, Z., Desgranges, J. P., Moreau, A., Lionis, C., Kotanyi, P., Carelli, F., Nowak, P. R., de Aguiar Sa Azeredo, Z., Marklund, E., Churchill, D., Ungan, M., (European General Practice Research Network Burnout Study Group)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burnout in European family doctors: the EGPRN study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Services Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medically unexplained symptoms in family medicine: defining a research agenda. Proceedings from WONCA 2007]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> Medically unexplained symptoms (MUSs) are frequently presented in primary care. Unfortunately, knowledge of these patients and/or symptoms in primary care is still limited. Available research comes mainly from Europe and North America, while the perspectives of cultures such as Africa, Asia and South America are relatively unknown. To bring cultural perspectives together, a symposium and workshop on MUS in primary care was held at the WONCA World Conference 2007 in Singapore.</p>
<p><b>Objective.</b> Main goals of this symposium and workshop&mdash;apart from presenting ongoing research and bringing together experts in MUS&mdash;were to detect knowledge gaps in MUS and to establish priorities in MUS research. This publication focuses on the proposed research agenda.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Using a nominal group technique, we generated research topics and set priorities. Research topics were grouped into research themes.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Participants&rsquo; (66 researchers and GPs from 29 nationalities) most important research topics were &lsquo;formulating a broadly accepted definition of MUS&rsquo;, &lsquo;finding a strategy to recognize MUS better and at an earlier stage&rsquo;, &lsquo;studying the value of self-management and empowerment in patients with MUS&rsquo; and &lsquo;finding predictors to decide which strategy will best help the individual patient with MUS&rsquo;. Priorities in research themes of MUS are as follows: (i) therapeutic options for patients with MUS and (ii) problems in consultations with these patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> More research on MUS in primary care is needed to improve the consultations with and management of these patients. Internationally primary care conferences are excellent for exchanging ideas and formulating central issues of research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[olde Hartman, T., Hassink-Franke, L., Dowrick, C, Fortes, S, Lam, C, van der Horst, H., Lucassen, P., van Weel-Baumgarten, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medically unexplained symptoms in family medicine: defining a research agenda. Proceedings from WONCA 2007]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Services Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving the appropriateness of laboratory submissions for urinalysis from general practice]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> Urine is the most common microbiology laboratory specimen. Submissions increase annually by 5&ndash;10%, and many specimens may be unnecessary.</p>
<p><b>Objectives.</b> To assess the impact of guidance, implemented by interactive workshops and reinforced with modified request forms, on specimen submission.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> This was a prospective randomized controlled study with modified Zelen design. The study population comprised five primary care trusts (PCTs) in Gloucestershire/County Durham/Darlington, containing 82 general practices in six geographical clusters. The six clusters were randomly assigned to urine workshop covering submission in the elderly, adults and children or a control workshop. Within these groups, half the practices were randomized to receive modified laboratory forms emphasizing the workshop messages. Practices were not aware of the study.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Workshops lead to a 12% reduction in urine submissions from 16- to 64-year olds, which persisted for the 15 months but had no effect on bacteriuria rate. Workshops had no significant effect in the elderly or children. Modified forms were not associated with any reduction in submissions but were associated with an 11% reduction in detection of significant bacteriuria in 16- to 64-year olds.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> The 12% decrease in urine submissions from 16- to 64-year olds, attained with workshops, may help counter relentlessly rising test submissions. Modified forms are currently not worth pursuing. When educational workshops are used across PCTs to change practice, the change in test submission is smaller than attained in educational initiatives involving volunteers. Workshops may be more effective if they also discuss urine submissions from asymptomatic patients and are directed at high testing practices and care homes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNulty, C. A., Thomas, M., Bowen, J., Buckley, C., Charlett, A., Gelb, D., Foy, C., Sloss, J., Smellie, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving the appropriateness of laboratory submissions for urinalysis from general practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Services Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> Primary care clinicians suggest that staff education is needed to increase chlamydia testing appropriately.</p>
<p><b>Objectives.</b> To determine if interactive workshops and modified laboratory request forms could increase testing and case detection.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Study design: Prospective cluster randomized controlled study, using modified Zelen's design, examining the effect of workshops and modified request forms on primary care clinicians&rsquo; chlamydia specimen submission and case positivity rate. Study population: 82 general practices in six geographical clusters within five primary care trusts (PCTs) in Gloucestershire and County Durham and Darlington. Intervention: Practices within geographical clusters were randomly assigned to workshops on chlamydia or a control consisting of comparable workshops on the management of urinary symptoms, held in PCT-protected learning time. Half the practices were randomized to receive modified laboratory request forms. Staff were unaware that they were part of a study.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Interactive workshops increased chlamydia testing in 16- to 24-year-old women by 33% in intervention practices compared to controls with effect persisting at 10 months (<I>P</I> = 0.003). No associated rise in the number of chlamydia infections was detected (<I>P</I> = 0.91), suggesting that increased testing may have occurred in a lower risk population. Modified forms did not change test submission (<I>P</I> = 0.75).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> Interactive workshops for general practices can be used to successfully increase chlamydia-testing rates. Chlamydia detection rates will need to be monitored as this type of educational programme may not increase absolute numbers of chlamydia infections detected, if patients at lower risk of infection are inappropriately tested. Other interventions may need to be combined with the workshops, to reach sufficiently high chlamydia screening rates to significantly reduce prevalence of chlamydial infection.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNulty, C. A., Thomas, M., Bowen, J., Buckley, C., Charlett, A., Gelb, D., Foy, C., Sloss, J., Smellie, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Services Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> Most recommended care for chronic diseases is based on the research of single conditions. There is limited information on &lsquo;best&rsquo; processes of care for persons with multiple morbidities. Our objective was to explore processes of care desired by elderly patients who have multimorbidities that may present competing demands for patients and providers.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Qualitative investigation using one-on-one interviews of 26 community-dwelling HMO members aged 65&ndash;84 (50% male) who had, at a minimum, the combined conditions of diabetes, depression and osteoarthritis. Participants were chosen from a stratified random sample to have a range of 4&ndash;16 chronic medical conditions.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Participants&rsquo; desired processes of care included: the need for convenient access to providers (telephone, internet or in person), clear communication of individualized care plans, support from a single coordinator of care who could help prioritize their competing demands and continuity of relationships. They also desired providers who would listen to and acknowledge their needs, appreciate that these&rsquo; needs were unique and fluctuating and have a caring attitude.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> These respondents describe an ideal process of care that is patient centered and individualized and that supports their unique constellations of problems, shifting priorities and multidimensional decision making. Individual and ongoing care coordination managed by a primary contact person may meet some of these needs. Achieving these goals will require developing efficient methods of assessing patient care needs and flexible care management support systems that can respond to patients&rsquo; needs for different levels of support at different times.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayliss, E. A, Edwards, A. E, Steiner, J. F, Main, D. S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Qualitative Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/294?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Poetry in general practice education: perceptions of learners]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/294?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> There has been little research into poetry-based medical education. Few studies consider learners&rsquo; perceptions in depth.</p>
<p><b>Objective.</b> To explore general practice registrars&rsquo; (GPRs) perceptions of two poetry-based sessions.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> GPRs in one general practice vocational training scheme experienced two poetry sessions. In one, the facilitator selected poems; in the other, poems were chosen by registrars. Poems were read and discussed, with emphasis on personal response. Data were obtained through in-depth semi-structured interviews with six registrars. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Identification of individual ideas and shared themes enabled exploration of the registrars&rsquo; experiences.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Registrars described how poetry helped them explore emotional territory. They recognized a broadening of education, describing how poems helped them consider different points of view, increasing their understanding of others. Vicarious experience, development of empathy and self-discovery were also reported. Participants speculated on how this might impact on patient care and professional practice. Facilitator-selected poems provided variety and ambiguity, provoking discussions with clinical relevance. Learner-selected poems enabled involvement, self-revelation and understanding of peers and developed emotional expression.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> These registrars reported difficulties expressing feelings in the culture of science-based medical training. Poetry sessions may provide an environment for emotional exploration, which could broaden understanding of self and others. Poetry-based education may develop emotional competence. The participants recognized development of key skills including close reading, attentive listening and interpretation of meaning. These skills may help doctors to understand individual patient's unique experience of illness, encouraging personalized care that respects patients&rsquo; perspectives.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foster, W., Freeman, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Poetry in general practice education: perceptions of learners]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>303</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>294</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Qualitative Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/304?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health communication and adolescents: what do their emails tell us?]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/304?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background.</b> It is widely known that barriers exist in communication between adolescents and health professionals. However, little is known about the actual language used by young people articulating such difficulties and whether email might allow them to overcome these problems.</p>
<p><b>Objectives.</b> The aims of this study were to investigate concerns and difficulties relating to communication among adolescents seeking online health advice.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> The study design was a corpus linguistic analysis of a million-word adolescent health email database based on 62 794 emails from young people requesting health advice from a prominent UK-hosted and doctor-led website.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> Young people reported various concerns about their health. They described numerous difficulties in disclosing such concerns to other people, in particular to parents and doctors. However, they readily expressed their concerns by email, displaying elevated levels of directness, particularly in relation to potentially sensitive or embarrassing topics.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion.</b> Email has the potential to facilitate and supplement face-to-face consultations with health professionals. Increased adoption of email by health providers may be an efficient means of engaging with a generation often reluctant to access more traditional health care services and thus encourage them to enter the primary care setting more readily.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harvey, K., Churchill, D., Crawford, P., Brown, B., Mullany, L., Macfarlane, A., McPherson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health communication and adolescents: what do their emails tell us?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Qualitative Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The coming of age of ICPC: celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care]]></title>
<link>http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/4/312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) has, since its introduction in 1987, been quite successful. Now in its second revised version, it has been translated in 22 languages, accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a member of the Family of International Classifications, and is being widely used both in routine daily practice and in research.</p>
<p>In this contribution, it is explained that ICPC was designed as a theoretical classification, and that it has especially great potential when used (1) supported by the ICPC2/ICD10 Thesaurus, (2) in sufficiently large studies to allow all classes to be observed often enough to provide reliable data, and (3) in studies based on data on episodes of care, rather than encounter data only. Under these conditions, the likelihood ratios of symptoms given a diagnosis, and of co-morbidity become available, which define the clinical content of family practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soler, J.-K., Okkes, I., Wood, M., Lamberts, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmn028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The coming of age of ICPC: celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Organization of Family Doctors</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>